MS Teams

Conceptualising Neolithic gender: the sexual division of labour amongst early farmers 

In a recent paper, John Robb and Oliver Harris provocatively argue that gender has been overlooked in the Neolithic because it was of a very different form to that found in the Bronze Age. Conversely, isotopic and aDNA analysis are increasingly favouring a patrilocal, and assuming a patrilineal Neolithic. In this talk, I will present a study which finds a rather strong sexed division of labour from the early Neolithic culture of the Linearbandkeramik - the earliest phase of farming in central Europe (5500-5000 cal BC). However, does difference between the sexes mean that we should argue for a binary form of gender in which “male” and “female” are exclusive categories? Do the arguments for a patriarchal Neolithic arise in our own biases or is it a good explanation for the archaeological record? These are not easy questions to answer. By exploring the intersection of different types of evidence from the burial record - burial practices, grave goods, isotopic evidence, health and skeletal markers, alongside drawing on ethnographic evidence - I will suggest that we need to explore different value systems to explain the diversity we see in the archaeology of gender.     

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info